S&P 500 Trading Mastery: A Systematic Trading Plan For Capturing Stock Index Profits Career trader Kelly Angle presents an impressive and effective new trading system for individual traders interested in taking on the notoriously unpredictable and often volatile S&P market…and succeeding. The central focus of the boo
| TITLE | : | S&P 500 Trading Mastery: A Systematic Trading Plan For Capturing Stock Index Profits |
| AUTHOR | : | |
| RATING | : | 4.53 (719 Votes) |
| ASIN | : | 0930233700 |
| FORMAT TYPE | : | Hardcover |
| NUMBER of PAGES | : | 160 Pages |
| PUBLISH DATE | : | 2002-01-28 |
| GENRE | : |
Career trader Kelly Angle presents an impressive and effective new trading system for individual traders interested in taking on the notoriously unpredictable and often volatile S&P market…and succeeding. The central focus of the book is on Kelly's S&P 500 Pro-Systema powerful "linked" trading system joining five separate strategies. Trains traders to profit in the stock index futures markets.
Editorial : About the Author Kelly Angle has nearly 20 years of market experience and currently runs his own asset management firm in New Canaan, CT.
Kelly Angle ran a top-rated newsletter/advisory service called "The Timing Device" for nearly 9 years.
This is Kelly Angle's second book. His first book was titled "100 Million Dollars In Profits" and was very well received.
Funny book, a little odd in places, but overall a good read. I found that the wisdom and teachings taken out of context of their books was, for me, ineffectual. In addition, the book is written in a way that will appeal to a broad audience, regardless of their specific religious or philosophic beliefs, and including both theists and atheists.. A historian tries to determine what events actually occurred and when, how and why they happened. All jokes aside, though, the net result is a rather awkward flow: a seemingly never-ending concatenation of ideas that, although related by theme, often contradict each other - by the author's own admission:
"Why do you think I laid out the premises explicitly for you, put you in a position of actively choosing to agree or disagree with them? Whey do you think I've approached this form so many directions? Why do you think I've expressed my o
No comments:
Post a Comment